Language selection

Search

What We Learned: External Consultation on Openness and Transparency Report

This report summarizes feedback received from external stakeholders during the Openness and Transparency consultation held from June 20 to August 2, 2018.

On this page

Introduction

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) plays a foundational role in protecting the health of Canadians and safeguarding our food, plant and animal resources. In an increasingly connected world, Canadians expect to have access to information that will help them make informed decisions in their day to day lives, and to hold government departments and agencies accountable for delivering results.

To meet these expectations and maintain public trust in Canada's regulatory system for food, plants and animals, the CFIA first launched its Transparency Agenda in 2011 as part of its ongoing efforts to be a more service-oriented, responsive and accountable organization. The Agency continues these efforts, by proactively releasing more data and information that is relevant, accurate and timely, while appropriately protecting personal and confidential information.

Openness and transparency continue to be core values guiding government operations. Many pressures, including the need to align with the Government of Canada Open Government initiative and enable Canadians to exercise their right to information, have caused the CFIA to re-evaluate its approach to openness and transparency. From June 20 to August 2, 2018 the CFIA held a public consultation in which external stakeholders were asked to provide feedback on its proposed approach to enhance openness and transparency at the agency. This report summarizes what we learned during this consultation.

Our Approach

Our Main Objectives

Who did we reach out to?

What we did

What we learned

At a Glance

infographic: At a Glance. Description follows.
Description of infographic: At a Glance

In 45 days it was estimated that over 600 participants were engaged.

502 surveys started

60% completion rate | Footnote: Completion rate is the number of surveys that were completed from start to finish

147 webinar attendees

Over 800 comments collected

Survey Participation by Type of Stakeholder

43% Industry

36% General Public

10% Government

4% Non-government Organization (NGO)

4% Other

3% Academia

Top 5 Ways Stakeholders Obtain CFIA Information

29% CFIA Website

18% E-mail

9% In-person

9% Listserv

9% Facebook

Footnote: Total percentage does not add up to 100% because only the top 5 ways stakeholders obtain information is displayed

Additional Results from Survey

46% access CFIA information weekly

83% think that the information they find is useful

49% agree that CFIA info helps them make decisions

52% of stakeholders say CFIA information is hard to find

79% of stakeholders were unaware of CFIA's openness and transparency agenda

Survey Participants by Location

39% from Ontario

21% from Quebec

17% from British Columbia

7% from Alberta

5% from Manitoba

3% from Nova Scotia

2% from New Brunswick

2% from Saskatchewan

1% from Prince Edward Island

1% from Newfoundland & Labrador

1% from outside of Canada

0% from Yukon, North West Territories, and Nunavut

Key Themes

Stakeholders were asked four key discussion questions for ideas and input around the following themes from the proposed Openness & Transparency Framework : Empower, Equip, Report and Innovate. The questions were:

  1. How can the CFIA provide Canadians with more useful, timely and accessible information about food safety, animal health and plant protection to help them make informed decisions?
  2. Which additional information and tools could the CFIA provide to help industry comply with regulatory requirements?
  3. How can the CFIA share more information about its compliance and enforcement activities?
  4. What can the CFIA do to help stakeholders and the public learn more about regulatory science, and have access to research and information from CFIA scientists?

All comments and feedback received from the four key discussion questions were taken into considerations, as well as:

Six key themes emerged that exemplified areas stakeholders would like the CFIA to focus on. In no particular order, these are:

  1. Increase access to information and tools for the general public
  2. Increase transparency of engagement activities
  3. Increase access to information about compliance and enforcement actions
  4. Share more CFIA research and science
  5. Open up CFIA resources used by CFIA personnel
  6. Enhance stakeholder access to CFIA expertise

These themes are described in more detail in the following sections.

1. Increase access to information and tools for the general public

We heard from all stakeholders that there is a growing expectation that government information should be made publically available in a useful, accurate and timely manner. Industry believed it was important that Canadians be provided with a level of general education about how the CFIA works as a precursor to releasing more complex information requiring context – for example, inspection results. Providing more information also means that the general public can learn and be knowledgeable about the CFIA's mandate, and how it differs from those of its domestic and international counterparts.

Consultation participants indicated that increased access to information in usable formats will help them understand the CFIA's processes, how it makes decisions, and this in turn would encourage greater engagement and understanding of its overall mission.

What participants said about how the CFIA can increase access to information and tools:

2. Increase transparency of engagement activities

Transparency of engagement activities is intended to improve trust as stakeholders will have an opportunity to have their voice heard in the development of CFIA regulations, programs, policies, and services, as well as to better understand the rationale behind regulatory decisions. Fostering trust is essential to ensure that stakeholders will continue to share their views and provide feedback that helps continually improve CFIA programs and services.

Throughout the consultation, stakeholders consistently said that while they appreciate the opportunity to participate in engagement activities, they felt that the results and outcomes of such activities could be more transparently communicated and shared. In addition to providing feedback, stakeholders said they want to know how all feedback is considered in development of the final product.

What participants said about how the CFIA can increase transparency of engagement activities:

3. Increase access to information about compliance and enforcement actions

Compliance and enforcement information, such as inspection outcomes, is of interest to Canadians. It has the potential to influence decisions about the products Canadians choose to purchase and allows them to hold the CFIA accountable for its actions.

From feedback received, the CFIA learned that industry was cautiously supportive of this approach and underlined the need to ensure that compliance and enforcement action information is placed within its proper context so that the public understands how to use it accurately, and what it should not be used for. Industry indicated that sharing information of this nature must be done responsibly, so as not to unduly damage the reputation of individual sectors or international trade of Canadian products.

Industry also noted there was value in having access to certain compliance reports both as an educational and a risk management tool. Similarly, they said that it would be useful to share best practices and lessons learned as part of optimizing food safety and other outcomes, and fulfilling their responsibility to ensure the health and well-being of those who consume and purchase their products.

What participants said about how the CFIA can post more information about compliance and enforcement actions:

4. Share more CFIA research and science

The CFIA is one of Canada's largest science-based regulatory agencies, and works with scientific organizations in Canada and internationally, with industry, academia and other partners to support and develop science that contributes to evidence based decisions. Participants showed great interest in having increased access to the scientific information used in regulatory decision-making processes. We learned that stakeholders use scientific information such as outcomes of research, surveillance and monitoring reports, risk assessments, and epidemiological studies as part of their own learning, research, and decision-making processes.

What participants said about how the CFIA can share more CFIA research and science:

5. Open up CFIA resources used by CFIA Personnel

The CFIA already makes regulatory and interpretative guidance publically available. Stakeholders, in particular industry, told us they would like increased access to materials to help them understand how CFIA inspectors conduct their regulatory inspections and support compliance with requirements.

What participants said about how the CFIA can open up resources used by CFIA personnel:

6. Enhance stakeholder access to CFIA expertise

Throughout the consultation we learned that stakeholders often relied on the expertise of CFIA staff to help answer questions about regulations. Stakeholders highlighted that they prefer to receive information from CFIA's subject matter experts. To access this information, stakeholders indicated using the CFIA website, emailing and telephoning the CFIA. What we heard was that while information collected via these sources was generally useful, stakeholders either found response times could be improved, or that information was not received in a timely manner, in many cases rendering it outdated for decision-making purposes.

What participants said about how the CFIA can enhance stakeholder access to CFIA expertise:

Next Steps

Revise Open and Transparent Agency Framework and Policy

The Open and Transparent Agency Framework and Policy are being revised using the comments and feedback received from both external stakeholders and CFIA employees during consultation.

Implementation and Action Plan

During the consultation in summer 2018, the CFIA indicated its plans were to post the improved framework and policy to its website in late fall of 2018. To ensure the CFIA duly considers all comments received, a public release is now anticipated for spring 2019.

In the case of the framework, an action plan will be developed to bring it to life. This action plan will consider:

Becoming more open and transparent requires a change in the way that we think and view our work. Pacing will be important, recognizing there will be a learning curve for both staff and stakeholders. Openness and transparency measures will be implemented in a way that is manageable for the Agency and our diverse stakeholders alike while preserving neutrality as a trusted federal regulator.

Thank you

The CFIA wishes to acknowledge all stakeholders and Canadians who participated in the consultation and the exceptional quality of the feedback provided. The discussions generated throughout the engagement activities have yielded invaluable insights and will help us deliver to you a more open and transparent CFIA.

Questions about this report?

Send us an email: Cfia.transparency-transparence.acia@canada.ca

Date modified: