Archived - Proposed Import Requirements for Animals Listed in Schedule III Susceptible to Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome (EUS)
This page has been archived
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
The consultation closed 2013-03-22.
In order to be consistent with the World Trade Organization Rules under the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS Agreement indicates), countries are required to ensure that import controls imposed on trade partners are not more restrictive than those required for domestic disease control purposes.
Based on a scientific evaluation of Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome (EUS), the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) will not be applying domestic disease control measures on the movement of seventy five (75) aquatic animal species that are currently listed in Schedule III of the Health of Animals Regulations as susceptible only to EUS. As a result and to ensure that Canadian policy is consistent with international standards and obligations, the CFIA will also remove the import controls associated with the importation of these same aquatic animal species.
The objective of this policy is to provide the scientific rationale for and implications of the removal of import and domestic controls of the seventy five (75) aquatic animal's species listed in Schedule III of the Health of Animals Regulations that are listed as susceptible to only EUS.
The WTO SPS Agreement indicates that any measures applied to trade partners should not be more restrictive than those a Member Country applies to control of a disease domestically.
Canada as a signatory to this agreement is removing import control measures for all aquatic animals susceptible to EUS listed in Schedule III of the Health of Animals Regulations.
EUS is listed in Schedule VII as an Immediately Notifiable Disease and, at the time of promulgation of the regulatory amendments in December 2010, was considered an exotic disease to Canada. Subsequently, EUS has been positively identified in wild fish in Ontario in 2010.
Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome has been evaluated against the criteria for listing diseases outlined in the Aquatic Animal Health Code (herein, the Code) of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Based on this evaluation, the CFIA has demonstrated that the current scientific evidence does not support the listing of EUS in the Code nor as a disease requiring domestic movement control to prevent spread of this disease within Canada.
Based on the evaluation of the science, the agent, Aphanomyces invadans, the purported cause of EUS:
- is an opportunistic water mould found globally;
- does not cause disease unless there is an inciting cause;
- is a disease agent whose occurrence is dependent on environmental factors;
- is a disease that can be managed/controlled in culture situations using environmental and other production manipulation methods.
- is caused by an agent that cannot be detected using usual surveillance methods as there is no reliable, robust and repeatable test method, that can be used on clinically healthy animals. Only when clinical lesions are visible on finfish can a diagnosis be made. Surveillance in healthy populations of fish cannot be conducted and this is required to establish freedom from EUS.
Given that the CFIA cannot accurately conduct surveillance required to establish the geographic parameters of this disease in Canada or put into place effective disease control measures to prevent spread of EUS or declare zone freedom from EUS, the CFIA will not be implementing import or movement restrictions for domestic disease control purposes for this disease at this time. Canada has proposed that Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome be removed from the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Aquatic Animal Health Code list of aquatic animal diseases of finfish; however at this time this disease continues to remain listed by the OIE. The science will continue to be evaluated and changes to this approach adapted as required.
Implications for Trade
The removal of import requirements, including export certification by the country of origin, will have a positive benefit for Canadian importers as well as Canada's trade partners. Canada's exports will be protected because EUS will remain in Schedule VII of the Health of Animals Regulations and be reported by laboratories. Canada will be able to use these reports to attest to Canada health status for EUS. Any disease specific requirements can be met through disease identification at the premises or compartment level if requested by an importing country.
Removal of import requirements for this disease will mean that ninety (90) finfish listed in Schedule III will no longer require import permits and zoosanitary certification from the country of origin to enter Canada. Of the ninety finfish, seventy five (75) species (Table 1) that are susceptible to EUS alone will no longer be subject to any disease response or control activities within Canada, or import permit and zoosanitary export certification requirements prior to entry into Canada.
The species listed as susceptible to EUS are imported live for the ornamental trade, food service and retail use, aquaculture and display in public zoo and aquaria. Given that the vast majority of the species susceptible to EUS and listed in Schedule III of the Health of Animals Regulations (75 of 90 species) are listed as susceptible to only EUS, the removal of import controls will mean a reduction in export certification requirements and overall costs for importers.
In 2012 there were approximately seven hundred and fifty (750) import transactions of the 75 EUS susceptible species worth $2.25M dollars. Each shipment must be accompanied by an import permit, which can be multi entry, and a zoosanitary export certificate which is issued on a shipment by shipment basis. The direct decrease in cost of permits is anticipated to be significant (approximately ~50 to 85K) and export certification costs which are higher will be removed. As such this will have a positive net benefit in cost reduction for importers and number of certification inspection activities conducted by exporting countries.
For exports, certification for aquatic animals is conducted by the CFIA only when requested by the importing country. If Canadian exporters wish to export to countries with requirements for EUS, the CFIA will be required to certify the health status at the premises level. The CFIA has the Aquatic Animal Health Compartmentalization Program which can include country specific export requirements. Alternatively, the CFIA can certify on a shipment by shipment basis by following the recommendations of the OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for surveillance for disease freedom.
EUS will remain on Canada's Immediately Notifiable disease list (Schedule VII) as long as it is listed by the World Animal Health Organization (OIE). This maintains Canada's ability to:
- re-impose import controls if deemed necessary,
- respond to detections of the agent if required,
- continue to meet Canada's international requirements for export if required by the importing country through premises-specific certification activities.
Implications on the Aquatic Resource Base
Implications for both the cultured and wild finfish resources are considered minimal at this time. Aphanomyces invadans is an opportunistic pathogen and requires water quality conditions that affect the integrity of the epidermal/dermal layer of the aquatic animal in order to invade and cause disease.
The CFIA suspects that Aphanomyces invadans is likely widespread in the natural waters of Canada. It has been found in finfish in many States in the US, including California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina, Connecticut, and Florida.
In 2012, EUS was detected in wild catfish in Hamilton Harbour, ON. This is the only reported finding of EUS and the significance is considered limited as sick fish were apparent for a short time with no subsequent reports in this species in Lake Ontario. EUS has never been detected in Canadian aquaculture premises.
The USA has not reported any significant impacts of EUS in their wild or cultured finfish populations.
|Taxonomic Name of Species Susceptible to EUS||Common name|
|Acanthopagrus australis||surf bream|
|Acanthopagrus berda||goldsilk seabream|
|Alosa sapidissima||American shad|
|Ambassis agassizii||agassiz's olive glassfish|
|Ameiurus melas||black bullhead|
|Amniataba percoides||barred grunter|
|Anabas testudineus||climbing perch|
|Aseraggodes macleayanus||narrowbanded sole|
|Bairdiella chrysoura||silver perch|
|Barbonymus gonionotus||java barab; silver barb|
|Barbus paludinosus||straightfin barb|
|Barbus poechii||dashtail barb|
|Barbus thamalakanensis||thamalakane barb|
|Barbus unitaeniatus||slender barb|
|Brevoortia tyrannus||Atlantic menhaden|
|Brycinus lateralis||stripped robber|
|Channa striata||striped snakehead|
|Cirrhinus mrigala||mrigal carp|
|Clarias batrachus||Philippine catfish|
|Clarias gariepinus||North African catfish|
|Clarias ngamensis||blunt-toothed African catfish|
|Colisa lalia||dwarf gourami|
|Fundulus majalis||striped killifish|
|Glossamia aprion||mouth almighty|
|Glossogobius giuris||tank goby|
|Hepsetus odoe||kafue pike|
|Hydrocynus vittatus||tiger fish|
|Labeo cylindricus||redeye labeo|
|Labeo lunatus||upper zambezi labeo|
|Labeo rohita||rohu labeo|
|Leiopotherapon unicolor||spangled perch|
|Lutjanus argentimaculatus||mangrove red snapper|
|Melanotaenia splendida||eastern rainbow fish|
|Micralestes acutidens||sharptooth tetra|
|Monopterus albus||Asian swamp eel|
|Mugil cephalus||flathead grey mullet|
|Mugil curema||white mullet|
|Nematalosa erebi||Australian river gizzard shad|
|Oreochromis andersonii||three spotted tilapia|
|Oreochromis macrochir||longfin tilapia|
|Oreochromis niloticus||Nile tilapia|
|Osphronemus gouramy||giant gourami|
|Oxyeleotris lineolata||sleepy cod|
|Oxyeleotris marmorata||marble goby|
|Platycephalus fuscus||dusky flathead|
|Pogonias cromis||black drum|
|Puntius sophore||pool barb|
|Rhodeus ocellatus||rosy bitterling|
|Sargochromis codringtonii||green happy|
|Sargochromis giardi||pink happy|
|Scatophagus argus||spotted scat|
|Schilbe intermedius||silver catfish|
|Schilbe mystus||African butter catfish|
|Scleropages jardini||Australian bonytongue|
|Scortum barcoo||barcoo grunter|
|Selenotoca multifasciata||spotbanded scat|
|Serranochromis angusticeps||thinface cichlid|
|Serranochromis carlottae||rainbow happy|
|Serranochromis robustus||yellow-belly bream|
|Sillago ciliata||sand sillago|
|Strongylura krefftii||long tom|
|Tilapia rendalli||redbreast tilapia|
|Tilapia sparrmanii||banded tilapia|
|Toxotes chatareus||spotted archerfish|
|Toxotes lorentzi||primitive archerfish|
|Trichogaster pectoralis||snakeskin gourami|
|Trichogaster trichopterus||three spot gourami|
|Tridentiger obscurus||dusky tripletooth goby|
|Taxonomic Name||Common name|
|Bidyanus bidyanus||silver perch|
|Carassius carassius||crucian carp|
|Cyprinus carpio koi||Koi carp|
|Cyprinus carpio||Common carp|
|Ictalurus punctatus||Channel catfish|
|Micropterus salmoides||largemouth black bass|
|Oncorhynchus mykiss||Rainbow trout|
|Plecoglossus altivelis||ayu sweetfish|
|Silurus glanis||Wels catfish|
- Date modified: